|
LOS ANGELES
TIMESOctober 17, 2004
Welcome to Post-Anglo L.A.
A filmmaker ponders the city's future
BY ABEL SALAS
"Los Angeles Now"
is your latest exploration of identity in Los Angeles and
California. Where does this theme get its power for you?
I went to Japan for vacation a couple of weeks ago, and coming
back through security I was taking my shoes off and there
was this young man. He'd just finished four years in the Navy
and he had a shock of blond dyed hair. Well, it was clear
to me that he was Mexican American. And when we finally got
around to talking about ethnicity, he says, "Let me make
it clear to you. My parents were Mexican American. But I don't
consider myself Hispanic. I don't consider myself Chicano.
I'm a Californian." I'm a suburban, middle-class brown
guy raised on an Anglo Angeleno ethos, maybe the zenith of
their power, the '70s. In 30 years of my somewhat adult life,
I've witnessed the transformation of this super-Anglo city
to a super-brown city. I tried to chronicle this sea change.
And I'm as impressed by it, unnerved by it, perplexed by it
as anybody else.
The film's ambience conveys motion and
disorientation. Was that intended?
I think we're in an in-between period where we haven't settled
into an understanding of what we are becoming. The majority
of our city's intellectuals, authors, writers, journalists
and filmmakers have very little contact with the part of the
city that's changed so drastically. When they do have contact,
they have no way to understand it. We're in a period of great
flux. Guys like me, we're not the final word on the subject.
We're just momentary translators. Our great Los Angeles poet
will be some beautiful young Korean-brown-Vietnamese-Blaxican
phenomenon that's probably going to define Los Angeles in
a way maybe that George Gershwin or some New York immigrant
did [on the East Coast].
What was the personal impetus for the
project?
I think it came out of a dissatisfaction with the way that
Los Angeles is seen and understood. A movie like "Volcano,"
they shoot it down in MacArthur Park, and there's no Mexican
in the whole thing. I saw "Collateral."
And it was still the black and white deal. [Latinos] were
still marginal, like bad salsa. The cultural elite, the people
who narrate this place, couldn't be more inadequate to the
task of understanding [it]. Right now the people who define
this place don't even live here, aren't of Los Angeles, truly.
They're still on the New York-L.A. axis. [East of La Brea]
is Mexico; it could be Lima, Peru, for all they know. That'll
change.
The film envisions a multiethnic Los Angeles composed of mainly
nonwhite groups. Yet according to the numbers, many African
Americans are moving out of metropolitan Los Angeles.
I think that for every group there's a sense of displacement.
I don't think African Americans are any different than anybody
else. I think those people happen to be perhaps a little more
candid, a little more honest, a little less politically correct
than a lot of us. There's a [second-generation] Mexican American
lady in the film who says, "I don't want to speak disparagingly"
[of more recent Latino immigrants], "but sometimes I
miss the quiet." She wasn't at ease. And I don't think
anybody is at ease.
So is today's Los Angeles a transitional
space?
All spaces are transitional spaces. Culture is always changing
and identity is shifting, if you're alive. You know, once
you unclench your fists. Even if you keep your fists clenched,
the ground's still moving underneath you.
What about you? What is L.A. to you?
It's home, the place I was born. A place where my parents
met. A place a lot of my people came to. A place where a lot
of my childhood friends live and a place where I'll never
quite feel particularly comfortable or at home. I keep imagining
a life that's not here. Somewhere more rooted, more touching,
a bit sweeter. But I'll never get there, because I'm too Los
Angeles. I'd crawl out of my skin.
"Los Angeles Now" airs Nov.
27 at 9 p.m. on KCET.
|
 |